AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Appgenome mac3/23/2023 ![]() " So far, findings suggest that Android applications tap into sensitive data, such as contact lists, less often than comparable applications for the iPhone.įor example, 33 percent of free applications on the iPhone can access a user’s location, compared to 28 percent of free Android applications. On a totally different topic, horray for actually being able to discuss this stuff here without a full-on flamewar. Google NEEDS to keep them onside and that won't happen if they're seen to capitulate to the providers. Now, granted, a lot of those core supporters give death threats if you so much as hint that there's any problem at all with Android (witness the insanity over that Engaget editorial a week or so back) but they're also the ones that are the most vocal in spreading the word. If they now roll over and let the carriers do whatever they like they're on dodgy ground with their core supporters. They made a big deal over that and the carriers basically told them where to stick it. Might be acceptable in basic feature phones (the Cookie's of this world) but not in high end devices and there are other alternatives out there.Ģ) Not a year ago Google made an effort to launch the Nexus One as carrier independent. Worse, it'll end up in a massively fragemented market with users having poor experiences. If you end up with a ton of Android devices that don't use Google as the search engine, don't have Google Market and remove Google location services etc then Google ain't going to make anything like as much money from those devices as they could do. ![]() actually there's a couple of problems:ġ) Ultimately it's not necessarily in their best interest. The problem with Google being willing to let the carriers etc run wild with Android is. Thought that's what you meant but wasn't quite sure. Phew, I think that covers it, hope it helps. You do have to confirm multiple times you want to install an app in this manner however. In addition Apps can be installed without going through any App store by getting an apk file onto the phone and installing manually. Apps can be installed from multiple sources (much as, say, a Jalibroken iPhone uses app repositories) which may offer more or less control than Google's own market. However as Android IS open there's nothing to stop other companies launching their own App store for the OS. In order to allow Google to manage rouge apps (or ones that look at 'em funny) they have the tools and rights to pull apps from the store and do remote wipes. While a lot looser than, say, Apple's equivalent documents there are certain things that will cause an app to be pulled but there is, AFAIK, no review process when an app is submitted. But they could demand that a device be painted purple and yellow if they wanted to.Īpps installed via the Market are subject to Google's terms and conditions. A couple of examples of this would be insisting that manufacturers use Google's location services rather than Skyhook and that a device must have 3G access not just Wi-Fi. Google authorises devices to install the Market application on a case-by-case basis (seemingly) and can impose whatever conditions they like. ![]() ![]() ![]() However Android does NOT include certain apps as standard, the most obvious of which is the Market. Anyone can obtain the source code and do what they like with it. hold on while I have a go at this:Īndroid is open as a platform. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |